case law citation us - An Overview
case law citation us - An Overview
Blog Article
Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Case law is specific into the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. As an example, a ruling in the California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents of the boy or Lady will not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they will Lower off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by regulation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mold the relief to really make it appropriate to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Within the United States, individuals are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in both civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their very own can remember a single rule of thumb when it comes to referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as you can, leading the court, not only towards the case, but into the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
Because of this, only citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling an individual to inform them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in such-and-such neighborhood, without actually offering them an address. Driving round the community trying to find their phone is likely being more frustrating than it’s worthy of.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a nicely-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the click here charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, assisting you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.
Undertaking a case regulation search could be as easy as entering specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case regulation searches, including:
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to become gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may be one or more judgments given (or reported). Only the reason with the decision on the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted in an argument.
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners might seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more